The role of self-directed humour in anarchist thought and practice
VIEW FULL TEXT

Keywords

humour
anarchism
liberation
absurdity

How to Cite

Orlov, D. (2024). The role of self-directed humour in anarchist thought and practice. The European Journal of Humour Research, 12(4), 290-296. https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR.2024.12.4.969

Abstract

This commentary article explores the role of humour within anarchist thought and practice, emphasising its function as a tool for challenging authority and established norms. Drawing on historical and philosophical sources, it investigates how humour has been used to expose the absurdity of authority and foster a sense of invulnerability against oppression. The paper highlights the use of humour in Parisian cabarets post the 1871 Paris Commune and the case of the French anarchist Ravachol’s smile. These examples, both discussed in the articles of Julian Brigstocke (2017, 2022), demonstrate two kinds of humour: directed at other and at one-self. Building on the ideas of Friedrich Nietzsche (1968, 2008) and Albert Camus (2012), I propose a theoretical framework suggesting that anarchist humour should be self-directed in nature, contrary to the argument of Brigstocke. The paper concludes by arguing that this form of humour, by confronting the absurdity of life and the limitations of norms, fosters liberation and resistance, thereby undermining the power of oppressive forces.

VIEW FULL TEXT

References

Arendt, H. (1972). Crises of the Republic: Lying in politics; Civil disobedience; On violence; Thoughts on politics and revolution. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Barrucand, V. (1892). Le Rire de Ravachol. L’Endehors, 64.

Brigstocke, J. (2017). Humour, violence and cruelty in late nineteenth-century anarchist culture. In Ferretti, F., Barrera de la Torre, G., Ince, A. & Toro, F. (Eds.), Historical geographies of anarchism, (pp. 65-86). Routledge.

Brigstocke, J. (2022). Resisting with authority? Anarchist laughter and the violence of truth. Social & Cultural Geography, 23(2), 173-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2020.1727555.

Camus, A. (2012). The rebel: An essay on man in revolt. Vintage.

Critchley, S. (2011). On humour. Routledge.

De Cleyre, V. (2004). The Voltairine de Cleyre Reader. AK Press.

Freud, S. (1927). Der Humor. Passage, 34, 18-21.

Gordon, M. (2015). Camus, Nietzsche, and the absurd: Rebellion and scorn versus humour and laughter. Philosophy and Literature, 39(2), 364-378. https://doi.org/10.1353/phl.2015.0045.

McGraw, A. P., & Warren, C. (2010). Benign violations: Making immoral behavior funny. Psychological science, 21(8), 1141-1149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610376073.

Nietzsche, F. (1968). The will to power. Kaufmann, W. & Hollingdale, R. J. (Eds.). Vintage Books.

Nietzsche, F. (2008). Thus spoke Zarathustra: A book for everyone and nobody. Oxford University Press.

Orlov, D. (2021). Origins of Bosnian humour and its role during the siege of Sarajevo. The European Journal of Humour Research, 9(4), 173-188. https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2021.9.4.522.

Ostrower, C. (2015). Humour as a defense mechanism during the Holocaust. Interpretation, 69(2), 183-195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020964314564830.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 The European Journal of Humour Research

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.