Keywords
impoliteness
incongruity
comic-style
play
How to Cite
Abstract
Pragmatic concepts and theories have largely explored naturally occurring conversations in varied social-political, cultural, and religious contexts. Yet, not so much has been done to explore ways pragmatics contributes to studying literary works, particularly drama. Hence, this research is an attempt to examine how impoliteness as a pragmatic construct reflects the dual purposes of not only identifying and categorising offensive speech acts but also in performing the aesthetic function of comic-styling, engaging the African play Prof. Zemzi’s last rehearsal written by Fidelis U. Okoro. The play as a comedy staged in a university setting presents a formal workplace where politeness work and restraint in language use are interactional norms to minimise face loss. Hence, the offensive dialogue between the protagonist, Prof. Zemzi, and other co-workers resulting in Face Threatening Acts (FTAs) and humour are explored, conceptualising (im)politeness in terms of the incongruity theory of humour. The study shows that the frequent use of intensified face threats, demeaning utterances, and ridicule are incongruous speech acts that buttress the humorous discourse style of the play. It argues that humorous dramatic impoliteness is a source of comic catharsis and that for impoliteness to be understood as funny, there is a shared socio-contextual cognition of the discourse as incongruous.
References
Aristotle (1984). The rhetoric and the poetics of Aristotle. (W. R. Roberts & I. Bywater, Trans.). New York: Random House. (Original work published ca. 384-322 BCE)
Antoniou, M. (2021). Insults and swear words in the TinTin Comic: Morpho-pragmatic contrastive study. Półrocznik Językoznawczy Tertium, 6(1), 86-121. https://doi.org/10.7592/Tertium2021.6.1.181.
Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic theories of humor. Mouton de Gruyter.
Attardo, S. (2017). The general theory of verbal humor. In S. Attardo (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and humor (pp. 126-142). Routledge.
Bousfield, D. (2008). Impoliteness in the struggle for power. In D. Bousfield & M. Locher (Eds.), Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice (pp.127-154). Mouton De Gruyter.
Bousfield, D. (2007b). Beginnings, middles and ends: A biopsy of the dynamics of impolite exchanges. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(12), 2185-2216. https://doi.org//10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.005.
Bousfield, D. (2023). Stylistics, speech acts and im/politeness theory. In M. Burke (2nd Ed.), The Routledge handbook of stylistics (pp. 121-140). Routledge.
Bray, J. (2023). Speech and thought presentation in stylistics. In M. Burke (2nd Ed.), The Routledge handbook of stylistics (pp. 235-250). London; Routledge.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness, some universal in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cao, Y. (2019). Humour and (im)politeness in Chinese sitcom discourse: A case study of Ipartment. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation].Western Sydney University.
Couder, O. (2019). Problem solved? Absurdist humour and incongruity-resolution. Journal of Literary Semantics, 48(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1515/jls-2019-2005.
Cronin, M. E. (2018). 'Feck off! 'Exploring the relationship between impoliteness, laughter and humour in the British-Irish sitcomes Father Ted, Black Books and The IT Crowd [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Birmingham.
Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25(3), 349-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3
Culpeper, J., Bousfield, D., & Wichmann, A. (2003). Impoliteness revisited: With special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(10-11), 1545-1579. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00118-2.
Culpeper, J. (2005). Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(1), 35-72. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35.
Culpeper, J. (2010). Conventionalised impoliteness formulae. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(12), 3232-3245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.007.
Culpeper, J. (2011). A final draft of politeness and impoliteness. In G. Andersen & K. Aijmer (Eds., Vol. 5), Pragmatics of society: Handbooks of pragmatics (pp. 391-436). Mouton de Gruyter.
Culpeper, J. (2016). Impoliteness strategies. In A. Capone & J. Mey (Eds., Vol.4). Interdisciplinary studies in pragmatics, culture and society. Perspectives in pragmatics, philosophy & psychology (pp.430-435). Springer.
Dynel, M. (2015). The landscape of impoliteness research. Journal of Politeness Research, 11(2), 329-354. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2015-0013.
Dynel, M. (2016). Conceptualizing conversational humour as (im) politeness: The case of film talk. Journal of Politeness Research, 12(1), 117-147. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2015-0023.
Evans, M., & Hogarth, A. (2021). Stylistic palimpsests: Computational stylistic perspectives on precursory authorship in Aphra Behn’s drama. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 36(1), 64-86. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqz085.
Gibbs Jr, R. W., Bryant, G. A., & Colston, H. L. (2014). Where is the humor in verbal irony? Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 27(4), 575-595. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2014-0106.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Anchor Books.
Hardie, A., & van Dorst, I. (2020). A survey of grammatical variability in Early Modern English drama. Language and Literature, 29(3), 275-301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947020949440.
Holmes, J. (2000). Politeness, power and provocation: How humour functions in the workplace. Discourse Studies, 2(2), 159-185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445600002002002
Jose, L. S., & Jose, L. S. (2024). Dissecting the linguistic tapestry of modernism: A comprehensive stylistic analysis of TS Eliot’s ‘The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock’. Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied and Basics Subjects, 4(2), 1-9. https://identifier.visnav.in/1.0002/ijabs-24b-28002.
Khafaga, A. (2023). Beyond relational work: a psycho-pragmatic analysis of impoliteness in Shakespeare’s King Lear. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02039-5.
Kuczok, M., Stwora, A., & Świerkot, M. (2020). Introduction to explorations in humor studies: Humor research project. In M. Kuczok, A. Stwora & M. Swierkot (Eds.), Explorations in humor studies: Humor research project (pp. 1-15). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Lintott, S. (2016). Superiority in humor theory. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 74(4), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/jaac.12321.
McDonald, P. (2013). The philosophy of humour. Humanities-Ebooks.
Mclntyre, D., & Culpeper, J. (2010). Activity types, incongruity and humour in dramatic discourse. In D. McIntyre & B. Busse (Eds.), Language and style (pp. 204-222). Palgrave Macmillan.
Morreall, J. (2020, Fall). Philosophy of humor. In N. E. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.). The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (sections 2-5). Metaphysics Research Lab, Standford University.
Mulder, M. P., & Nijholt, A. (2002). Humour research: State of art. (CTIT Technical Report Series; No. 02-34). Centre for Telematics and Information Technology (CTIT). http://www.ub.utwente.nl/webdocs/ctit/1/0000009e.pdf.
Odebunmi, A. (2006). A pragmatic reading of Ahmed Yerima’s proverbs in Yemoja, Attahiru, and Dry Leaves on Ukan Trees. Intercultural Pragmatics, 3(2), 153-169. https://doi.org/10.1515/IP.2006.010
Odebode, I., & Odesanya, A. (2015). A socio-pragmatic analysis of Ahmed Yerima's Ade Ire: International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(1), 117-132. https://doi.org/10.30845/ijll
Ojukwu, C. K., & Dike, C. J. (2023). Politeness strategies and face-threatening acts in master-servant relationships in selected Wole Soyinka and William Shakespeare’s Drama Texts. IKENGA: International Journal of Institute of African Studies, 24(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.53836/ijia/2023/24/1/008.
Okoro, F.U. (2002). Prof. Zemzi’s Last Rehearsal. Fulladu Publishing Company.
Oluremi, T. A., & Olugbemi-Gabriel, O. (2022). Yoruba proverb as impoliteness and power negotiator in Kemi Adetiba’s King of Boys. African Study Monographs, 42, 21-38. https://doi.org/10.34548/asm.42.21.
Pfetsch, F. R. (2011). Power in international negotiations: symmetry and asymmetry. Négociations, 2, 39-56. https://doi.org/10.3917/neg.016.0039.
Plato (1970). Plato's Philebus. (R. Hackforth, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published ca. 360-347 BCE)
Raskin, V. (1979). Semantic mechanism of humor. Proceeding of the fifth annual meeting of the Berkely Linguistics Society, pp. 325-33. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v5i0.2164.
Raskin, V. (2017). Script-based semantic and ontological semantic theories of humor. In S. Attardo (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and humor (pp. 49-63). Routledge.
Seizer, S. (2017). Dialogic catharsis in standup comedy: Stewart Huff plays a bigot. Humor. International Journal of Humor Research, 30(2), 211-237. https://doi.org10.1515/humor-2016-0026.
Simpson, P., & Bousfield, D. (2017). Humor and stylistics. In S. Attardo (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and humor (pp. 158-173). Routledge.
Terkourafi, M. (2008). Toward a unified theory of politeness, impoliteness and rudeness. In D. Bousfield & M. Locher (Eds.), Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice (pp. 45-74). De Gruyter Mouton.
Toddington, R. S. (2015). Impoliteness as a vehicle for humour in dramatic discourse [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Central Lancashire.
Ugwuanyi K.O., & Ekeh S.N. (2015). Shifting the borders: Genre-crossing in modern African drama. Research Innovator-International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 2(5), 1-11.
Warner, C. (2023). Literary pragmatics and stylistics. In M. Burke (2nd Ed.), The Routledge handbook of stylistics (pp. 385-403). Routledge.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 The European Journal of Humour Research