Keywords
age differences
cartoons
content analysis
children and adults
How to Cite
Abstract
This study explores how age influences the perception and appreciation of humour, particularly in cartoon formats aimed at children and adults. Although humour has been extensively studied through various theoretical lenses-such as incongruity, superiority, and relief theories-its developmental aspects remain underexplored. To address this, the study examines cartoons created by the same illustrators for two Turkish magazines: Penguen (targeted at adults) and Süper Penguen (targeted at children). A total of 264 cartoons were analysed based on three dimensions: the humour mechanism identified, the character representations, and thematic elements. In addition, a survey involving 20 participants (10 adults and 10 children) was conducted to evaluate perceived funniness and target audience accuracy. Findings indicate that incongruity-based humour dominates in both magazines, and animal characters are more prevalent in children’s cartoons. Notably, 48% of adults and only 34% of children correctly identified child-targeted cartoons, while some children’s cartoons received the highest funniness ratings from adults. These results challenge assumptions about “childish” humour and suggest that age is not a reliable predictor of humour appreciation. We argue that cartoons operate within a visual and symbolic language that transcends age when freed from content-based biases. By examining both textual elements and audience reception, this study contributes to humour research by demonstrating how shared cultural codes and cognitive development intersect in comedic perception across generations. At the same time, the study should be regarded as exploratory, given the small and homogeneous sample size, and its findings interpreted as indicative trends rather than generalisable results. Nevertheless, by comparing cartoons created by the same illustrators for different audiences, the study offers a novel contribution. These insights also connect to current debates on the social and educational functions of humour, underlining its potential to transcend generational boundaries.
References
Banas, J., Dunbar, N.E., Rodriguez, D., & Liu, S. (2011). A review of humor in educational settings: four decades of research. Communication Education, 60, 115 - 144.
Bariaud, F. (1989). Age differences in children's humor. In P. E. McGhee (Ed.), Humor and children's development: A guide to practical applications (pp. 15-45). The Haworth Press.
Beattie, J. (1778). Essays: on poetry and music as they affect the mind; on laughter, and ludicrous composition; on the utility of classical learning. William Creech.
Bergen, D. (2018). Humor as a developmental phenomenon: The contributions of Paul McGhee. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 31(2), 213-232. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2016-0091
Berger, A. A. (1976). Laughing matter/anatomy of the joke. Journal of Communication, 113-115.
Berger, K. S. (2008). The developing person through the life span. Worth Publishers.
Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity . McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Billig, M. (2005). Laughter and ridicule towards a social critique of humour. SAGE Publications.
Bischoff, M., Schmidt, S. & Muehlan, H. (2021). Development and validation of the child humor orientation scale short-form. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 34(1), 69-92. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2020-0020
Burke, C. L., & Copenhaver, J. G. (2004). Animals as people in children’s literature. Language Arts, 81(3), 205-213. https://doi.org/10.58680/la20042896
Carbajal-Carrera, B., & Sánchez Castro, O. (2020). The role of secondary incongruities in cartoon appreciation. The European Journal of Humour Research, 8(2), 25-48. https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2020.8.2.Carbajal-Carrera
Erdem, S. (2014, December). Untitled cartoon [Cartoon]. Süper Penguen, 12.
Erdem, S. (2018, February). Untitled cartoon [Cartoon]. Süper Penguen, 4.
Erdem, S. (2018, Mayıs 9). Çocuk Karikatür Dergilerindeki Dil ve Temalar. (K. Nazlı, Interviewer)
Ford, T. E., Boxer, C. F., Armstrong, J., & Edel, J. R. (2008). More than “just a joke”: The prejudice-releasing function of sexist humor. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(2), 159-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207310022
Freud, S. (1998). Espriler ve Bilinçdışı İle İlişkileri [Wit and its relation to the unconscious] (E.Kapkın, Trans.). Payel Yayınevi.
Ganea, P. A., Canfield, C. F., Simons-Ghafari, K., & Chou, T. (2014). Do cavies talk? The effect of anthropomorphic picture books on children’s knowledge about animals. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 283. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00283
Geerdts, M. S. (2016). (Un)real animals: Anthropomorphism and early learning about animals. Child Development Perspectives, 10(1), 10-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12153
Greenwood, D., & Isbell, L. M. (2002). Ambivalent sexism and the dumb blonde: Men’s and women’s reactions to sexist jokes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(4), 341-350. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.t01-2-00073
Hazlitt, W. (1845). Lectures on the English comic writers. Wiley and Putnam.
Hobbes, T. (1840). The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury (Vol. IV). (S. W. Molesworth, Ed.). John Bohn.
Jay, T. (2009). The utility and ubiquity of taboo words. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(2), 153-161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01115.x
Jiang T, Li H and Hou Y (2019) Cultural differences in humor perception, usage, and implications. Frontiers in Psychology, 10: 123. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00123
Lefcourt, H. M., & Martin, R. A. (1986). Humor and life stress antidote to adversity. Springer-Verlag.
Long, D. L., & Graesser, A. C. (1988). Wit and humor in discourse processing. Discourse Processes, 11(1), 35-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538809544690
Ludovici, A. M. (1932). The secret of laughter. Constable & Co Ltd.
Martin, R. A. (2007). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Elsevier Academic Press.
Martin, R. A., & Ford, T. (2018). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach (2nd ed.). Elsevier Academic Press.
McDougall, W. (1903). The theory of laughter. Nature, 67(1736), 318-319. https://doi.org/10.1038/067318a0
McGhee, P. E. (1977). Children's humour: A review of current research. In A. J. Chapman, & H. C. Foot (Eds.), It's a funny thing, humour (pp. 199-209). Pergamon Press.
McGhee, P. E. (1979). Humor: Its origin and development. Freeman.
McGhee, P. E. (1983). Humor development: Toward a life span approach. In P. E. McGhee, & J. H. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of humor research (Volume I) (pp. 111-134). Springer -Verlag.
McGhee, P. E. (1984). Play, incongruity, and humour. In T. D. Yawkey, & A. D. Pellegrini (Eds.), Child's play: Developmental and applied (pp. 219-236). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
McGhee, P. E. (1986). Humor across the life span: Sources of developmental change and individual differences. In L. Nahemow, K. A. McCluskey-Fawcett, & P. E. McGhee (Eds.), Humor and aging (pp. 27-51). Academic Press.
McGhee, P. E., Ruch, W., & Hehl, F.-J. (1990). A personality-based model of humor development during adulthood. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 3(2), 119-146. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1990.3.2.119
McGraw, A. P., & Warren, C. (2010). Benign violations: Making immoral behavior funny. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1141-1149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610376073
Morreall, J. (2009). Comic relief: A comprehensive philosophy of humor. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.
Nahemow, L. (1986). Humor as a data base for the study of aging. In L. Nahemow, K. A. McCluskey-Fawcett, & P. E. McGhee (Eds.), Humor and aging (pp. 3-26). Academic Press.
Paulos, J. A. (1980). Mathematics and humor. The University of Chicago Press.
Penguen, S. (2018, Nisan 15). Süper Penguen. Retrieved from Süper Penguen Web Site: https://www.superpenguen.com/nedensuperpenguen.
Pexman, P. M. (2023). Irony and thought: Developmental insights. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr & H. L. Colston (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of irony and thought (pp. 181-196). Cambridge University Press.
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. (M. Cook, Trans.). International Universities Press.
Piaget, J. (2003). The psychology of intelligence. (M. Piercy, & D. Berlyne, Trans.). Routledge.
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. (A. Parsons, Trans.). Basic Books.
Platon. (1975). Philebus. (J. C. Gosling, Trans.). Clarendon Press.
Rappoport, L. (2005). Punchlines: The case for racial, ethnic, and gender humor. Praeger Publishers.
Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic mechanisms of humor. D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Reider, L. B., & LoBue, V. (2024). The influence of anthropomorphism on children’s learning and attitudes toward snakes. Frontiers in Developmental Psychology, 2, 1356604. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdpys.2024.1356604
Revi, R. (2015). Understanding obscenity and offensive humour: What’s funny?. The European Journal of Humour Research, 2(3), 98-114. https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2014.2.3.revi
Ritchie, G. (2009). Variants of incongruity resolution. Journal of Literary Theory, 3(2), 313-332. https://doi.org/10.1515/JLT.2009.017
Robinson, H.L., Rose, S.E., Elliott, J.M., & Vivaldi, R.A. (2024) Teachers’ humour use in the classroom: A scoping review. Educational Psychology Review, 36, 73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09913-x
Rosenbusch, H., Evans, A. M., & Zeelenberg, M. (2022). The relative importance of joke and audience characteristics in eliciting amusement. Psychological Science, 33(9), 1386-1394. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976221098595.
Schopenhauer, A. (1966). The world as will and representation (Vol. 2). (E. F. Payne, Trans.) Dover Publications.
Shultz, T. R. (1972). The role of incongruity and resolution in children’s appreciation of cartoon humor. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 13(3), 456-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(72)90074-4
Simons, C. J., McCluskey-Fawcett, K. A., & Papini, D. R. (1986). Theoretical and functional perspectives on the development of humor during infancy, childhood, and adolescence. In L. Nahemow, K. A. McCluskey-Fawcett, & P. E. McGhee (Eds.), Humor and aging (pp. 53-80). Academic Press.
Spencer, H. (1860, Mart). The physiology of laughter. (D. Masson, Ed.) Macmillian's Magazine, 1, 395-402.
Suls, J. M. (1972). A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons: An information-processing analysis. In J. H. Goldstein, & P. E. McGhee (Eds.), The psychology of humor theoretical perspectives and empirical issues (pp. 81-100). Academic Press.
Süper Penguen. (2018, May 21). Neden Süper Penguen? Retrieved from Süper Penguen Web site: https://www.superpenguen.com/nedensuperpenguen
Waytz, A., Epley, N., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010). Social cognition unbound: Insights into anthropomorphism and dehumanization. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 58-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721409359302
White, E. B., & White, K. S. (1941). A subtreasury of American humor. Coward-McCann.
Yaşaroğlu, E. (2014). Untitled cartoon [Cartoon]. Penguen, 628, 16.
Yaşaroğlu, E. (2015). Untitled cartoon [Cartoon]. Penguen, 661, 13.
Yaşaroğlu, E. (2018, April). Untitled cartoon [Cartoon]. Süper Penguen, 28.
Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1980). Misattribution theory of tendentious humor. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16(2), 146-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(80)90005-0
Zillmann, D. (1977). Humour and communication: Introduction to symposium. In A. J. Chapman, & H. C. Foot (Eds.), It's a funny thing humour (pp. 291-301). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 The European Journal of Humour Research