From theory to practice: an empirical investigation of the Mutual Vulnerability Theory of laughter using Trevor Noah’s comedy
VIEW FULL TEXT

Keywords

humour
laughter
Trevor Noah
Mutual Vulnerability Theory
stand-up comedy

How to Cite

Donian, Jennalee. 2026. “From Theory to Practice: An Empirical Investigation of the Mutual Vulnerability Theory of Laughter Using Trevor Noah’s Comedy”. The European Journal of Humour Research 14 (1): 131-45. https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR.2026.14.1.1122.

Abstract

This study constitutes the first systematic investigation of the Mutual Vulnerability Theory (MVT) of laughter, through an exploratory examination of audience responses in Trevor Noah’s 2013 stand-up comedy segment “It Makes No Sense”. While classical humour theories— incongruity (triggering laughter through resolution of cognitive contradictions), superiority (eliciting laughter via perceived dominance over others’ misfortunes), and relief (producing laughter as tension release from repressed emotions)—have dominated scholarly discourse for centuries, the MVT presents a paradigm that conceptualises laughter as a communicative mechanism for negotiating social status hierarchies through the recognition and articulation of shared human vulnerabilities. The investigation examines three primary objectives: to evaluate the MVT’s explanatory capacity in accounting for observable laughter patterns within this specific comedic context; to assess the theoretical coherence and analytical utility of its vulnerability taxonomy; and to identify conceptual limitations requiring theoretical refinement. Employing systematic video analysis methodology, all 57 instances of audience laughter were documented and categorised according to MVT principles, with each episode analysed for antecedent vulnerability references across the framework’s four domains—physical, emotional, cognitive, and social areas. The empirical findings demonstrate that every documented laughter instance was preceded by the identification of at least one vulnerability type. This empirical examination provides supporting evidence for the MVT's explanatory capacity within this specific context while simultaneously illuminating theoretical tensions, particularly concerning the theory’s conceptualisation of vulnerability and its epistemological alignment with contemporary disability studies scholarship.

VIEW FULL TEXT

References

Attardo, S. (2001). Humorous texts: A semantic and pragmatic analysis (Vol. 6). Walter de Gruyter.

Billig, M. (2005). Laughter and ridicule: towards a social critique of humour. Sage.

Boyd, B. (2009). On the origin of stories: Evolution, cognition, and fiction. Harvard University Press.

Browdy, M. (2021). Classifying laughter: An exploration of the identification and acoustic features of laughter types [Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania].

Cambridge Dictionary (2025). Vulnerability. In Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. Retrieved September 20, 2025, from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/vulnerability

Curran, W., McKeown, G.J., Rychlowska, M., André, E., Wagner, J. & Lingenfelser, F. (2018). Social context disambiguates the interpretation of laughter. Frontiers in Psychology 12(8), 2342. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02342

Davila-Ross M., Allcock B., Thomas C., & Bard K. A. (2011). Aping expressions? Chimpanzees produce distinct laugh types when responding to laughter of others. Emotion 11, 1013–1020. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022594

Donian, J., & Holm, N. (2021). Trevor Noah and the contingent politics of racial joking. The European Journal of Humour Research, 9(3), 30-48. https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2021.9.3.525

Dynel, M. (2013). Impoliteness as disaffiliative humour in film talk. In M. Dynel (Ed.). Developments in linguistic humour theory (pp. 105-144). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.1.07dyn

Filipe, A. M., Bogossian, A., Zulla, R., Nicholas, D. & Lach, LM. (2021). Developing a Canadian framework for social determinants of health and well-being among children with neurodisabilities and their families: An ecosocial perspective. Disability and Rehabilitation 43(26), 3856–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1754926

Ford, A., De Togni, G., Erikainen, S., Filipe, A. M., Pickersgill, M., Sturdy, S., & Young, I. (2024). How and why to use ‘vulnerability’: an interdisciplinary analysis of disease risk, indeterminacy and normality. Medical Humanities, 50(1), 125-134. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2023-012683

Freud, S. (1905). Jokes and their relation to the unconscious. In Freud – Complete Works. Ivan Smith, 2010 [e-book]. (Original work published in 1905)

Kant, I. (1952). Critique of judgement (J. M, Creed, Trans.). Clarendon Press.

McGraw, A. P., & Warren, C. (2010). Benign violations: Making immoral behaviour funny. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1141-1149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610376073

Morreall, J. (1983). Taking laughter seriously. SUNY Press.

Morreall, J. (2009). Humour as cognitive play. Journal of Literary Theory, 3(2), 241-260. https://doi.org/10.1515/JLT.2009.014

Noah, T. (2013). It makes no sense! - Trevor Noah - (African American). YouTube. Retrieved October 20, 2024, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r5yCk6Qpuv4.

Scott, S. K., Lavan, N., Chen, S., & McGettigan, C. (2014). The social life of laughter. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(12), 618-620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.09.002

Simon, J.C. (2008). Why we laugh: A new understanding. Starbrook Publishing.

Simon, J.C. (2020). Laughter redefined. Israeli Journal of Humour Research, 9(1), 72-90. Retrieved from https://www.israeli-humor-studies.org/media/05-laughter_and_redefined_14.pdf

Spencer, H. (1860, March). The physiology of laughter. Macmillan’s Magazine, 395-402.

Usher, K., Jackson, D., Walker, R., Durkin, J., Smallwood, R., Robinson, M. & Marriott, R. (2021). Indigenous resilience in Australia: A scoping review using a reflective decolonizing collective dialogue. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 630601. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.630601

Veatch, T.C. (1998). A theory of humour. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 11(2), 161–216. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1998.11.2.161

Walker, M. (2021). Laughter as a kind of common sense. Hannah Arendt Center. Retrieved February 19, 2025 from https://hac.bard.edu/amor-mundi/laughter-as-a-kind-of-common-sense-2021-06-25.

Wilson-Barlow, L. (2024). The physiological effects of laughter. Findapsychologist.org. Retrieved January 12, 2025 from https://www.findapsychologist.org/the-physiological-effects-of-laughter-by-lindsay-wilson-barlow/

Winder, N. P. & Winder, I. C. (2015). Complexity, compassion and self-organisation: human evolution and the vulnerable ape hypothesis. Internet Archaeology, 40. http://dx.doi.org/10.11141/ia.40.3

Yim, J. (2016). Therapeutic benefits of laughter in mental health: A theoretical review. The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine, 239(3), 243-249. https://doi.org/10.1620/tjem.239.243

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 The European Journal of Humour Research

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.