Keywords
humour ideologies
Macedonian citizens
popular opinions
How to Cite
Abstract
Views and evaluations of humour are governed by sociocultural assumptions about what humour is, how it works, and where its limits lie. These assumptions are shaped by various forces, including states’ political histories, sociopolitical views and identities, humour traditions, and more. All these factors inform popular humour ideologies—sets of beliefs and attitudes—about what humour is and how it works or should not work. In a sense, humour ideologies represent a spectrum of attitudes toward humour. This spectrum spans from the benign “just a joke” perspective, through positive evaluations of humour as a means of social criticism, resistance, and change, to severe criticism of humour as a tool that exacerbates social divisions, reproduces inequalities, and perpetuates discourses of racism and gender discrimination. The latter perspective has dominated American and Western European scholarship on disparagement humour. Within this context, our goal is to analyse material (humour ideologies) distinct from what these research trends typically rely upon. Our focus in this study is on the evaluations and attitudes toward humour held by Macedonian citizens. By analysing this material, we aim to demonstrate the contextual dependence of humour ideologies on specific political histories, power relations, and humour traditions.
References
Abedinifard, M. (2016). Structural functions of the targeted joke: Iranian modernity and the Qazvini man as predatory homosexual. Humor. International Journal of Humor Research, 29(1), 85–108. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2016-0008.
Adriaensen, B., Bricker, A. B., Godioli, A., & Laros, T. (2023). Humor and the law: Laughter as critique/the limits of laughter. Law, Culture and the Humanities. 21(2), 163-174. https://doi.org/10.1177/17438721231177647. (Original work published 2025)
Austin, J.L. (1962). How to do things with words. [The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University 1955]. Oxford University Press.
Benatar , D. (1999). Prejudice in jest: When racial and gender humor harms. Public Affairs Quarterly, 13(2), 191-203. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40441225 .
Benatar, D. (2014). Taking humour (ethics) seriously, but not too seriously. Journal of Practical Ethics, 2(2), 15–31. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2464556.
Bicknell, J. (2007). What is offensive about offensive jokes?. Philosophy Today, 51(4), 458-465. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday200751430.
Billig, M. (2001). Humour and hatred: The racist jokes of the Ku Klux Klan. Discourse & Society, 12(3), 267–287. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42888362 .
Billig, M. (2005). Laughter and ridicule: Towards a social critique of humour. Sage Publications.
Boskin, J., & Dorinson, J. (1985). Ethnic humor: Subversion and survival. American Quarterly, 37(2), 191-211. https://doi.org/10.2307/2712764.
Davies, C. (1998). Jokes and their relation to society. Mouton de Gruyter.
Davies, C. (2002). The mirth of nations. Transaction Publishers.
Davies, C. (2004). The right to joke. Social Affairs Unit.
Davies, C. (2007). Humour and protest: Jokes under communism. International Review of Social History, 52, 291–305. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26405495.
Davies, C. (2010). Jokes as the truth about soviet socialism. Folklore, 46, 9–32. http://www.folklore.ee/folklore/vol46/davies.pdf.
Davies, C. (2011). Jokes and targets. Indiana University Press.
De Sousa, R. (1987). The rationality of emotion. MIT Press.
Dynel, M., & Poppi, F. I. M. (2019). Risum teneatis, amici? The socio-pragmatics of RoastMe humour. Journal of Pragmatics, 139, 1–21.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.10.010.
Erotic jokes. (2022, November). Vicoteka [Joke store]. Retrieved March 3rd, 2025, from https://www.vicoteka.mk/vicovi/erotski/ .
Ford, T. E. (2000). Effects of sexist humor on tolerance of sexist events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(9), 1094-1107.https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207310022.
Ford, T. E., & Ferguson, G. M. (2004). Social consequences of disparagement humor: A prejudiced norm theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0801_4.
Ford, T. E., Boxer, C. F., Armstrong, J. R., & Edel, J. R. (2008). More than ‘just a joke’: The prejudice-releasing function of sexist humor. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(2), 170-182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207310022.
Ferguson, M. A., & Ford, T. E. (2008). Disparagement humor: A theoretical and empirical review of psychoanalytic, superiority, and social identity theories. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 21(3), 283-312. https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMOR.2008.014.
Ford, T. E., Kochersberger, A. O., Woodzicka, J. A., Romero-Sánchez, M., & Carretero-Dios, H. (2014). The role of identification with women as a determinant of amusement with sexist humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 27(1), 105-128. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2014-0071.
Gruner, R.C. (1997). The game of humor: A comprehensive theory of why we laugh. Transaction Publishers.
Hodson, G., & Prusaczyk, E. (2021). Cavalier humor beliefs: Dismissing jokes as ‘just jokes’ facilitates prejudice and internalizes negativity among targets. In M. Strick & T. E. Ford (Eds.), The social psychology of humor (pp. 170–188). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003042440-10-14.
Hodson, G., Rush, J. E., & MacInnis, C. C. (2010). A joke is just a joke (except when it isn't): Cavalier humor beliefs facilitate the expression of group dominance motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(3), 467-481. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019993.
Hodson, G., & MacInnis, C. C. (2016). Derogating humor as a delegitimization strategy in intergroup contexts. Translational issues in psychological science, 2(3), 291-298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/tps0000052 .
Hodson, G., & Prusaczyk, E. (2021). Cavalier humor beliefs: Dismissing jokes as ‘just jokes’ facilitates prejudice and internalizes negativity among targets. In R. K. M. Ruch (Ed.), The social psychology of humor (pp. 189–208). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003042440-10-14.
Kramer, E. (2011). The playful is political: The metapragmatics of internet rape-joke arguments. Language in Society, 40(2), 137–168. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23011805.
Kuipers, G. (2006). Good humor, bad taste: A sociology of the joke. Mouton de Gruyter.
Laineste, L. (2011). Politics of taste in a post–Socialist state: A case study. In V. Tsakona & D. E. Popa (Eds.), Studies in political humor: In between political critique and public entertainment (pp. 217–241). John Benjamins.
Lewis, P., Davies, C., Kuipers, G., Martin. A.R., Oring, E., Raskin, V. (2008). The Muhammad cartoons and humor research: A collection of essays. Humor. International Journal of Humor Research, 21(1), 1-46. https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMOR.2008.001.
Lockyer, S. (2006). A two-pronged attack? Exploring private eye's satirical humour and investigative reporting. Journalism Studies, 7(5), 765–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700600890422.
Lockyer, S., & Pickering, M. (2001). Dear shit–shovellers: Humor, censure and the discourse of complaint. Discourse and Society, 12(5), 633–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012005004.
Lockyer, S., & Pickering, M. (Eds.). (2005). Beyond a joke: The limits of humour. Palgrave Macmillan.
Maio, G. R., Olson, J. M., & Bush, S. L. (1997). Disparagement humor: A contributor to negative attitudes toward Newfoundlanders. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(4), 336-348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297234008.
Morreall, J. (1987). The philosophy of laughter and humor. State University of New York Press.
Pérez, R. (2013). Learning to make racism funny in the ‘color-blind’ era: Stand-up comedy students, performance strategies, and the (re)production of racist jokes in public. Discourse & Society, 24(3), 358–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513482066
Pérez, R. (2017). Racism without hatred? Racist humor and the myth of ‘color-blindness.’ Sociological Perspectives, 60(2), 237–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121417719699
Pérez, R. (2022). The souls of white jokes: How racist humor fuels white supremacy. Stanford University Press.
Pérez, R., & Kuipers, G. (2024). Cultural analysis of racial and ethnic humor. In T. E. Ford , W. Chłopicki & G. Kuipers (Eds.), De Gruyter Handbook of Humor Studies (pp. 221-241). Mouton de Gruyter.
Philips, M. (1984). Racist acts and racist humor. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 14(1), 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.1984.10717059.
Pickering, M., & Lockyer, S. (2008). You must be joking: The sociological critique of humour and comic media. Sociology Compass, 2(3), 808–820. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00108.x
Ruiz-Gurillo, L. (Ed.). (2016). Metapragmatics of humor: Current research trends. John Benjamins.
Ryan, K. M., & Kanjorski, J. (1998). The enjoyment of sexist humor, rape attitudes, and relationship aggression in college students. Sex Roles, 39(9-10), 721-731. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018868913615.
Sinkeviciute, V. (2019). Juggling identities in interviews: The metapragmatics of “doing humor”. Journal of Pragmatics, 152, 216–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.005
Saucier, D. A., Lawless, T. J., Miller, S. S., & Prokhorets, S. (2024). Disparagement humor and subversion. In T. E. Ford , W. Chłopicki & G. Kuipers (Eds.), De Gruyter Handbook of Humor Studies (pp. 351-368). De Gruyter.
Saucier, D. A., O'Rourke, J., & Sheeran, N. (2018). Cracking wise to break the ice: The potential for racial humor to ease interracial anxiety. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 31(4), 503-527. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2018-0133.
Stangor, C., Sullivan, J. L., & Ford, T. E. (2001). Changing racial beliefs by providing consensus information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(4), 432–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201274009
Takovski, A. (2015). From joker to the butt and back: Ethnic identity construction through humour. Language and Dialogue, 5(1), 128-151. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.5.1.07tak
Takovski, A. (2018). Extending ethnic humour theory: Genuine vs. functional ethnic jokе scripts. The European Journal of Humour Research, 6(2), 60-80. https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2018.6.2.254.takovski.
Takovski, A. (2019). Representing sexuality through folklore: Erotic folktales and online jokes as “mirrors” of gender hierarchies. Electronic Journal of Folklore, 75, 149-172. https://doi.org/10.7592/FEJF2019.75.takovski
Takovski, A. (2025). How ethnic is ethnic humor? Theorizing a relationship between ethnic humor and identity, Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 38(2), 283-310. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2024-0113
Tapley, R. (1989). Humour, beliefs, and prejudice. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 15(4), 371–389. https://doi.org/10.5840/swphilreview20122819
Tsakona, V. (2020). Recontextualizing humor: Rethinking the analysis and teaching of humor. De Gruyter Mouton.
Tsakona, V. (2013). Okras and the metapragmatic stereotypes of humor: Towards an expansion of the GTVH. In M. Dynel (Ed.), Developments in linguistic humor theory (pp. 25–48). John Benjamins.
Tsakona, V., & Chovanec, J. (2024). The sociopragmatics of humor. In T. E. Ford, W. Chłopicki & G. Kuipers (Eds.), De Gruyter Handbook of Humor Studies (pp. 289–306). De Gruyter.
Weaver, S. (2010), Developing a rhetorical analysis of racist humour: examining anti-black jokes on the Internet, Social Semiotics, 20 (5), 537-555, https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2010.513188.
Weaver, S. (2011). Jokes, rhetoric and embodied racism: A rhetorical discourse analysis of the logics of racist jokes on the internet. Ethnicities, 11(4), 413–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796811407755 .
Weaver, S. (2016). The rhetoric of racist humour: US, UK and global race joking. Routledge.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 The European Journal of Humour Research