Abstract
This study analyses the visual representations of the steer metaphor employed by Dr. Bawumia during the submission of his candidacy for the 2023 NPP presidential election, which will culminate in the 2024 presidential election, from the perspective of the cartoonist. Cartoons are regarded as a visual genre of communication that employs a range of techniques, including metaphor, metonymy, symbolism, irony, and exaggeration, to convey socio-political, economic, religious, and trendy issues that have gained the attention of the general public. A total of ten political cartoons featuring a steer and Dr. Bawumia were meticulously selected and downloaded from the Facebook page of 3 News cartoonist, who uses the pseudonym Tilapia Da Cartoonist. In terms of the theoretical framework that underpins this study, the author employs Lakoff and Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory (CMT) and Forceville's multimodal metaphor approach for the analysis of the data. The analysis comprises the identification of the conceptual metaphor underlying each cartoon, employing the A is B format. It also entails a critical examination of the effective utilisation of semiotic tools by the cartoonist, which assists in the elucidation of the intentions behind these cartoons. The analysis of the data has yielded some intriguing insights. It appears that the cartoonist's frequent use of the metaphor "driver's steer" relating to Dr. Bawumia serves to reinforce the verbal statement made to the public. The application of multimodal metaphor to this study has the potential to elucidate the import of real-life events and characters through the medium of an imaginary scenario, which can persuade the audience. Furthermore, it encourages critical thinking about a particular individual or entity. Additionally, it provides information about political issues, events, and players that no other medium could openly transmit. This makes the political cartoon an extremely powerful tool in our democratic system.
References
Abdulwahid, H. Y. (2022). Analyzing Iraqi political cartoons. Cihan University-Erbil Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(1), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.24086/cuejhss.v6n1y2022.pp47-53
Akpati, C. F. (2019). A multimodal discourse study of some online campaign cartoons of Nigeria’s 2015 presidential election. IAFOR Journal of Arts & Humanities, 6(2), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.22492/ijah.6.2.07
Brantner, C., & Lobinger, K. (2014). Campaign comics: The use of comic books for strategic political communication. International Journal of Communication, 8(1), 248–274.
Conners, J. L. (2017). Party animals of the 2016 presidential primaries: Political cartoon representations of the Republican and Democratic parties. American Behavioral Scientist, 61(6), 600–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764217722249
DeSousa, M. A., & Medhurst, M. J. (1982). Political cartoons and American culture: Significant symbols of campaign 1980. Studies in Visual Communication, 8(1), 84–97. https://repository.upenn.edu/handle/20.500.14332/48427
Edwards, J. L. (2001). Running in the shadows in campaign 2000: Candidate metaphors in editorial cartoons. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(12), 2140–2151.
El Refaie, E. (2009). Multiliteracies: How readers interpret political cartoons. Visual Communication, 8(2), 181–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357209102113
Forceville, C. (1996). Pictorial metaphor in advertising. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203272305
Forceville, C. (2008). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In E. Tabakowska, M. Choiński, & Ł. Wiraszka (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (pp. 379–402). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197761.5.379
Forceville, C. (1994). Pictorial metaphor in advertisements. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 9(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0901_1
Heinemann, S., & Graz, K. (2011). Multimodal metaphors and their use in advertising and political cartoons – A research overview. In E. Ventola & A. T. Petroni (Eds.), Perspectives in multimodality (pp. 15–52). John Benjamins.
Koller, V. (2009). Brand images: Multimodal metaphor in corporate branding messages. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 45–72). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366.2.45
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202–251). Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Malek, A. A., Mahmoud, A. H., & Nouri, A. A. (2021). A cognitive semantic study of conceptual blending in selected political caricatures used in American election campaign in 2020. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(14), 5620–5628.
Müller, C., & Cienki, A. (2009). Words, gestures, and beyond: Forms of multimodal metaphor in the use of spoken language. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 297–328). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366.5.297
Totry, M., & Medzini, A. (2013). The use of cartoons in popular protest that focus on geographic, social and political issues. European Journal of Geography, 4(1), 22–35.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 The European Journal of Humour Research
